Raghav Motani, a 24-year-old student from India, had a clear understanding of the financial commitments required to pursue his two-year master’s degree in Australia. With tuition fees amounting to $70,000, alongside visa processing costs, health insurance, and housing expenses of $800 per fortnight, he felt prepared for the challenges ahead. However, when he learned that Opposition Leader Peter Dutton had likened him and his fellow international students to the “modern version of boat arrivals,” Motani had pressing questions. “Why are you using these words to describe us? What have we done that’s unlawful?” he asked. “We’ve not come illegally; we’re contributing to the economy. Protect us.”
Dutton’s Controversial Comparison
Dutton made his remarks during a segment on 2GB, referring to a report by The Australian that highlighted a dramatic surge in student visa appeals, primarily from Indian and Chinese students. According to recent data, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) received 8,204 student visa cases in the year leading up to May 31, a significant increase from 2,057 in the previous year. It’s crucial to note that only individuals already in Australia whose temporary visa applications have been rejected can appeal to the tribunal, a process that carries a hefty fee of $3,496.
In his statement, Dutton echoed rhetoric from the Abbott-led Coalition’s 2013 campaign aimed at curtailing illegal maritime arrivals. “People have found a weakness in the system; they are exploiting the weakness… and ultimately have stayed in Australia or extended their stay,” he remarked.
Responses from Student Representatives
Weihong Liang, chair of the NSW International Student Representative Committee, expressed concern over the continuous targeting of international students. “The constant negative rhetoric creates an unwelcome atmosphere,” Liang stated. “There seems to be a growing trend to compete over who can be tougher on international students.” He warned that this attitude could lead potential students to consider other countries that are more welcoming and inclusive.
Phil Honeywood, CEO of the International Education Association of Australia (IEAA), criticized Dutton’s comparison, noting that the Coalition government had previously created loopholes during the pandemic that facilitated the presence of non-genuine students. “The Morrison government — without any consultation with the international education sector — announced uncapped work rights for supposedly full-time overseas students,” he explained. Dutton, who served as a key minister in that government, had a hand in allowing this influx of students, many of whom sought economic opportunities rather than education.
Changes to Work Rights and Visa Policies
The policy allowing unlimited working hours was reversed by the Labor government in July 2022, capping work at 24 hours per fortnight. However, by that time, Honeywood asserted, Australia’s reputation in education had already suffered significant damage.
He attributed the surge in visa appeals to a concurrent increase in visa refusals as part of a federal government crackdown on non-genuine students who exploit the education system for work and residency opportunities. Data shows that only 80% of student visas were granted in the year leading up to August 31, a stark decline from the 95.7% approval rate recorded in 2020-2021.
Honeywood argued that comparing international students appealing visa decisions to asylum seekers was “palpably wrong,” emphasizing that most of these students arrived by air, not by boat. “Many months ago, Peter Dutton made it clear he wanted to fight an election on migration — and Labor ministers have told me they have little choice,” he said.
Government’s Defense and Broader Implications
In response to Dutton’s comments, a spokesperson for Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke defended the government’s actions, stating, “We won’t apologize for returning integrity to the international education system.” The spokesperson questioned the basis of Dutton’s criticism, asking whether he was addressing the issues that arose during his time in government or the tribunal’s decisions that he had previously influenced.
In July, the federal government more than doubled the international student visa fee to $1,600 and implemented stricter visa conditions, including tougher English language requirements and regulations for education agents facilitating overseas students’ enrollment. A month later, Education Minister Jason Clare announced a proposed cap on international student enrollments, limiting the total number of students across the tertiary sector to 270,000.
Political Dynamics and Student Reactions
Mehreen Faruqi, the deputy leader of the Greens and spokesperson for higher education, criticized both major parties for what she termed a bipartisan “attack” on the international education sector. “Labor has made international students the new political footballs in this racist dog-whistling game. Migrants, international students, and people of color will yet again be harmed by this dangerous rhetoric,” she stated.
Motani and his peers continue to grapple with the implications of this rhetoric on their futures in Australia. Many international students contribute significantly to the local economy and the education sector, yet they find themselves at the center of political debates that often neglect their contributions and experiences.
Conclusion
As international students like Raghav Motani face increasing scrutiny, the broader discussion on immigration and student visas continues to evolve in Australia. Dutton’s remarks have sparked a backlash from students and advocates, highlighting the need for a more nuanced and respectful dialogue around international education. The growing concerns over visa policies and the portrayal of students in political discourse emphasize the importance of recognizing their contributions while ensuring that policies support genuine educational pursuits rather than exploitative practices. As the situation develops, the impact of these discussions will be felt not only by current students but also by future generations seeking educational opportunities in Australia.
Related topics:
